One thing I like about digiscoping is that one has the ability to run
right home, download the image, and then view it essentially "life-size"
on the screen. Assuming the image is in reasonable focus and in decent
light, one can look at details of each feather; check for signs of molt
and its progress; and look at details like bill grooves on tattlers. I
have never been able to do these things with my regular 500mm lens because
I just haven't had the time and/or patience to get frame filling shots.
Now, it is comparatively easy to do so.
This page has a series of images of juvenal shorebirds in Monterey County, California, taken between 15 Aug-1 Sep 2004. The locations are Carmel R. mouth, Crespi Pond, and Pt. Joe in Pebble Beach. The photos are meant to be viewed as "filling your screen," with a little commentary on the following shots. If you look at the photo (right) in full screen mode, you'll see why I call it: "Bowling for tringas"All photos with an Olympus Camedia 560 through a Leica Trinovid 77 scope |
|
No hint of molt. All the rows of upperwing coverts (greater, median, lessers) show fresh feathers with clean white notches densely packed along each edge. Note how the apparent bill color changes between these two shots, based just on the angle of lighting. |
|
Not only are all the rows of upperwing coverts crisp and fresh (the key to ageing this as a juvenal) but there is no molt as yet on the crown, back, or scaps. This is a good photo for looking at the details of each individual juvenal feather. |
|
This bird still has crisp juvenal coverts, back, scaps, and tertials. The only signs of molt are on the head; it looks like at least the nape, and possibly the cheeks and crown, have been replaced already. Other than that, this is a bright crisp bird. |
|
This juvenal Western is now well into body molt. Note that the upperwing coverts have not been replaced — they still have broad white fringes. The new feathers are the pale gray feathers with thin black shaft streaks appearing on the back and in the scapulars. There are a mixture of new first-basic feathers and retained black-centered juvenal feathers in the scapulars, and the innermost row of scaps still has the rusty-edged juvenal feathers which is so characteristic of hatch-year Westerns in Sep-Oct. |
|
I've never tried ageing this species before, but to me the coverts look very fresh; we can even see the short lesser coverts with broad white tips up near the bend of the wing. However, the back, head, and breast all seem a lot browner. This could be either (a) exposure to sun bleaches the blackish color browner quickly or (b) these are new first-basic feathers. I was not able to entirely resolve this in Prater et al. (1977). Comments would be welcome. |
|
This is clearly a juvenal; see all the thin buff tips to the coverts. It also nicely illustrates wear in juvenal feathers. The tertials have thin white edges but they are almost worn off — and this bird couldn't have been present for more than a couple of weeks. Some of the longer scapular feathers are already heavily worn; it looks like all the little buffy spots (similar to what remains on the coverts) have already worn off. I spent a long time studying this bird because I thought the nasal groove was shortish [Gray-tailed Tattler has a shorter nasal groove than Wandering] but I eventually learned that the nasal groove is in front of the nasal gap (which is obvious) and is, rather, the much shallower groove that goes forward more than half the length of the bill. |
|
|
|
Literature cited:
Prater, A.J., J.H. Marchant, and J. Vuorinen. 1977. Guide to the identification and ageing of Holarctic waders. BTO Guide 17. British Trust for Ornithol., Tring, UK. |